Realized savings ledger

Every reduction tracked from flagged to paid; the number the outcome fee is billed on

PeriodGenerate outcome-fee statement

From flagged to cash kept

of reviewed spend

Flagged by AI and specialists

→

Applied · 74% of flagged

→

Appealed · 13% of applied

→

Reinstated · 46% of appealed

→

Realized, reconciled to payment · 6.9% of reviewed

→

91%

Retained at 12 months

By rule

Precision of auto-applied adjustments is measured against appeal outcomes and specialist overrides

Rule	Auto-apply precision	Trend	Read
LMG-4.2 Approved rate	99.1%	Stable	Deterministic; keep auto-apply
LMG-6.1 Block billing	86% · specialist tier	−22% Q/Q	Firms are splitting entries; narrative test losing power
LMG-7.3 Clerical / administrative	96.4%	Stable	Keep auto-apply
LMG-5.4 Duplicative attendance	91%	Improving	Engagement-letter exceptions now parsed
LMG-9.1 Excessive time for task	97.8%	Rising	Time-reasonableness now carries the most weight

Invoice-level value bridge · 2026-0918

EventAmountEvidenceOriginal bill$23,460LEDES 98BIProposed adjustments$2,6705 findingsRestored on appeal($405)Specialist decisionFinal payable$21,195Client approvalPaid$21,195ClaimCenter payments 28 SepAllocated review cost($141)Specialist timeNet realized on this invoice$2,124On payment

Value categories kept distinct

Invoice reductions, realized

Reconciled to payment; the outcome-fee base

Avoided future spend

Settle/defend and routing decisions; recognized at claim close

$1.9M est.Expected cost difference

Firm reallocation vs incumbent; recognized on outcome

$1.1M est.Deferred capacity

Hours moved, not cash saved

410 h

These are never summed into one "savings" figure.

Outcome fee this period

22% of realized savings · platform floor fee met · statement reconciles line by line to ClaimCenter payments

ReviewerUpheldM. Naidoo (specialist)96%Specialist pool94%AI auto-apply97%Client reviewers89%