Realized savings ledger

Every reduction tracked from flagged to paid; the number the outcome fee is billed on

PeriodGenerate outcome-fee statement

From flagged to cash kept

of reviewed spend

Flagged by AI and specialists

→

Applied · 74% of flagged

→

Appealed · 13% of applied

→

Reinstated · 46% of appealed

→

Realized, reconciled to payment · 6.9% of reviewed

→

91%

Retained at 12 months

By rule

Precision of auto-applied adjustments is measured against appeal outcomes and specialist overrides

Rule	Auto-apply precision	Trend	Read
OCG-1.2 Approved rate	99.0%	Stable	Deterministic; keep auto-apply
OCG-4.1 Block billing	85% · specialist tier	−17% Q/Q	Firms splitting entries
OCG-2.4 First-year associates	97.2%	Stable	Keep auto-apply; watch re-titling
OCG-5.2 Duplicative attendance	90%	Improving	Engagement-letter exceptions parsed
OCG-6.1 Excessive time / leverage	97.6%	Rising	Leverage test by matter type now n > 50 on 80% of lines

Invoice-level value bridge · 2026-3312

EventAmountEvidenceOriginal bill$184,600LEDES 98BIProposed adjustments$18,2505 findingsRestored on appeal($2,375)Specialist decisionFinal payable$168,725Client approvalPaid$168,725Coupa / SAP payments 28 SepAllocated review cost($1,108)Specialist timeNet realized on this invoice$14,767On payment

Value categories kept distinct

Invoice reductions, realized

Reconciled to payment; the outcome-fee base

Avoided future spend

Diligence scoping and settle/defend decisions; recognized at close

$5.2M est.Expected cost difference

Firm reallocation vs incumbent; recognized on outcome

$3.1M est.Deferred capacity

Pre-LOI diligence staged

640 h

These are never summed into one "savings" figure.

Outcome fee this period

22% of realized savings · platform floor fee met · statement reconciles line by line to Coupa / SAP payments

ReviewerUpheldT. Pillay (specialist)96%Specialist pool94%AI auto-apply97%Client reviewers89%