Realized savings ledger

Every reduction tracked from flagged to paid; the number the outcome fee is billed on

PeriodGenerate outcome-fee statement

From flagged to cash kept

of reviewed spend

Flagged by AI and specialists

→

Applied · 74% of flagged

→

Appealed · 13% of applied

→

Reinstated · 46% of appealed

→

Realized, reconciled to payment · 6.9% of reviewed

→

91%

Retained at 12 months

By rule

Precision of auto-applied adjustments is measured against appeal outcomes and specialist overrides

Rule	Auto-apply precision	Trend	Read
OCG-1.2 Approved rate	99.0%	Stable	Deterministic; keep auto-apply
OCG-4.1 Block billing	85% · specialist tier	−16% Q/Q	Firms splitting entries
OCG-3.1 Local counsel and vendors at cost	96.8%	Rising	Keep auto-apply; invoice attachment now mandatory
OCG-5.2 Duplicative attendance	90%	Improving	Engagement-letter exceptions parsed
OCG-10.2 Site and international travel	94%	Losing power	Narratives now cite working time en route; shift to reasonableness test

Invoice-level value bridge · 2026-5520

EventAmountEvidenceOriginal bill$412,800LEDES 98BIProposed adjustments$24,0005 findingsRestored on appeal($2,700)Specialist decisionFinal payable$391,500Client approvalPaid$391,500SAP payments 28 SepAllocated review cost($2,477)Specialist timeNet realized on this invoice$18,823On payment

Value categories kept distinct

Invoice reductions, realized

Reconciled to payment; the outcome-fee base

Avoided future spend

Settle/arbitrate and scoping decisions; recognized at award or settlement

$4.4M est.Expected cost difference

Firm reallocation vs incumbent; recognized on outcome

$2.6M est.Deferred capacity

Permit filings staged to next quarter

380 h

These are never summed into one "savings" figure.

Outcome fee this period

22% of realized savings · platform floor fee met · statement reconciles line by line to SAP payments

ReviewerUpheldM. Naidoo (specialist)96%Specialist pool94%AI auto-apply97%Client reviewers89%