Realized savings ledger

Every reduction tracked from flagged to paid; the number the outcome fee is billed on

PeriodGenerate outcome-fee statement

From flagged to cash kept

of reviewed spend

Flagged by AI and specialists

→

Applied · 74% of flagged

→

Appealed · 13% of applied

→

Reinstated · 46% of appealed

→

Realized, reconciled to payment · 6.9% of reviewed

→

91%

Retained at 12 months

By rule

Precision of auto-applied adjustments is measured against appeal outcomes and specialist overrides

Rule	Auto-apply precision	Trend	Read
OCG-2.1 Fixed-fee schedule	99.0%	Stable	Deterministic; keep auto-apply
OCG-4.1 Block billing	85% · specialist tier	−18% Q/Q	Firms splitting entries
OCG-3.2 Translation / agent at cost	96.1%	Stable	Keep auto-apply
OCG-5.1 Claim-count cap	90%	Losing power	Filings being split to stay under 20 claims
OCG-6.1 Excessive time for OA response	97.5%	Rising	Comparables by art unit now n > 50 on 78% of lines

Invoice-level value bridge · 2026-7741

EventAmountEvidenceOriginal bill$31,240LEDES 98BIProposed adjustments$4,7405 findingsRestored on appeal($480)Specialist decisionFinal payable$26,980Client approvalPaid$26,980SAP AP payments 28 SepAllocated review cost($187)Specialist timeNet realized on this invoice$4,073On payment

Value categories kept distinct

Invoice reductions, realized

Reconciled to payment; the outcome-fee base

Avoided future spend

Renewal pruning and abandonment decisions; recognized when the deadline passes

$2.6M est.Expected cost difference

Firm reallocation by art unit; recognized on grant

$1.9M est.Deferred capacity

Filings staged to next quarter

220 h

These are never summed into one "savings" figure.

Outcome fee this period

22% of realized savings · platform floor fee met · statement reconciles line by line to SAP AP payments

ReviewerUpheldR. Mehta (specialist)96%Specialist pool94%AI auto-apply97%Client reviewers89%